- #BORLAND C 5.02 FULL 32 BIT#
- #BORLAND C 5.02 FULL CODE#
- #BORLAND C 5.02 FULL PC#
- #BORLAND C 5.02 FULL WINDOWS 7#
If successful, yes congratulations, if failed, try again. Installing Borland's very easy because they live next course. When the installer window appears, click Nex, next, accept, etc.
#BORLAND C 5.02 FULL WINDOWS 7#
Works on all Windows OS (I use the Windows 7 Ultimate)Īfter the download is complete, extract the files Borland c + + 5.02.rar Here are details Borland C + + that I upload this.īorland C + + is a development program of Turbo C + + So that you can apply what I post on this blog. With this program, you can learn a lot about C + + programming language, as well as for you who want to learn C + +, but it does not have a compiler, you can download it here free. Borland C + + is a C + + compiler which is very famous for its speed compile and execute the program from the syntax that we make.
Scripting - Server Side (PHP, Perl, etc.).Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) & XAML forum.NET Installation and Configuration Issues Quick Navigation Visual C++ Programming Top
#BORLAND C 5.02 FULL CODE#
Just compile the 16-bit EXE with Borland, and the 32-bit code EXE Borland also. Why didn't you just compile the same code with the same compiler? Right now, you're comparing apples to oranges. So you really haven't discovered anything special there. It is always the claim of the Watcom C++ compiler to produce the fastest code. This way, no 32-bit registers would or could be used.Īlso, two different compilers produce different binary code, some more optimal than others.
#BORLAND C 5.02 FULL PC#
You should run the 16-bit program under DOS (this means your PC must boot DOS and run from there, and not run from a Windows 95 or NT session). Your other claim that you see 16 and 32-bit registers used when running a 16-bit application also messes up the test. So your 16-bit program has no Pentium instructions, since Pentium instructions are for 32-bit only. The reason is that the 16-bit program has to work on 386 and 486 machines also. When you choose 16-bit mode, there is no way that it should produce Pentium instructions, even if you specified it. Is anything due to the parallel processing in Pentium Processor? Is it possible due to the memory allocation and the floating point matrix manipulation,Ĭould you please kindly tell me the reasons?ĥ.
Why this significant time reduction can occur?Ĥ.
#BORLAND C 5.02 FULL 32 BIT#
32 bit issue, then could you please tell me the details If it is really due to the compiler, could you please tell me the reason?ģ. why my 32 bit program can run 50% faster than the 16 bit program?Ģ. Besides, the program has to perform a lot of floating point matrix manipulations.ġ. My program consists of a lot of memory allocation and reallocation functions like malloc() and realloc(). Than the time elapsed for the 16 bit program compiled by Borland. Both DOS programs are run in a Pentium II 400MHzįrom the measurement, the time elapsed for the 32 bit program that complied by DJGPP is about 50% LESS I run both programs and using the same method to measure the time elapsed. No optimization option is set at this time. Second, I use DJGPP to compile the same C program and create a 32 bit protected mode DOS program (.exe). I notice from the turbo debugger, the program uses 16 bit registers and also 32 bit registers like ax and eax.
In this case, I set the following optimization optionsģ. I have a few questions regarding to the time elapsed in 16 bit Dos program and 32 bit Dos program.įirst, I use Borland C++ version 5.02 to compile my C program and create a 16 bit real mode DOS program (.exe).